» in my experience...
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elsewhere...
·8bit joystick ·a list apart ·amishrobot ·arcadezen ·antipixel ·boxes and arrows ·black belt jones ·curiousLee ·daring fireball ·design interact ·design not found ·everything hurts ·forwarding address: osx ·gridface ·info design ·izzywizzy ·jon madisons ·joshua kaufman ·k10k ·kalsey ·kelake ·kuro5hin ·the lion's web(log) ·louise ferguson ·memepool ·metafilter ·quinn macdonald ·railhead design ·rentzsch ·surfin' safari ·the onion ·winterspeak ·web-graphics ·xblog ·zen haiku Here at IMX
Recent posts...
·Unreal 2 is... uh, not so great. ·Video Game legitimization. ·Random access info architecture. ·Too soon. ·I want my P2P. ·Detecting alphanumeric characters in JavaScript. ·Having some copyright fun with GarageBand. ·Are five minute compositions worth anything? ·Yeah, GarageBand is cool. ·Taking the plunge (again).
Categorically speaking...
·AOL
·Apple and Mac OSX ·Books and Reading ·Business Technology ·Design ·Design Technology ·Effort ·Gaming ·Information Architecture ·Interaction Design ·Internet Consulting ·JavaScript ·O'Reilly Emerging Tech Conference ·Personal ·Photography ·Random ·Software ·U and I ·UI Programming ·Usability ·User Experience ·Web Browsers ·Weblogs and Blogging ·When Bad Things Happen to Good BMW's Memes R' Us
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazon has a blogging patent? No.
[ Posted by Dan on February 26, 2003 | 5 Comments ] Amazon, and more specifically, Jeff Bezos has a new patent under his belt that, in the simplest of terms is... A method and system for conducting an electronic discussion relating to a topic.When I first heard that from a friend of mine, I thought the blogosphere was the target, and that Daypop might have a new number one item. Well, as of this moment, it's not the number one item at Daypop, and the blogosphere is going to be ok, because... What is claimed is:So, as long as I don't ever offer an item for sale as a blog posting, I'll be ok? That still seems overly simplistic, doesn't it... After all, I'm just one person, and I don't have any significant sales thruput (read: none at all). My guess is that Epinions is the one that needs to be nervous about this. The vagueness of "discussion relating to an item offered for sale" blankets the Epinions business model (even if they don't sell the stuff themselves, the discussion is related to a product for sale). I'm amazed that Amazon can patent things like this, or more to the point, that the US Patent Office allows it to happen. The last patent that seemed absurd was one click ordering that Apple actually licensed, which no doubt is making my Macintosh habit more expensive. [via Slashdot]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2001 - 2003 by Daniel Kapusta | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||