» in my experience...

» home | about | contact | résumé
» archives | donate | rss syndication

»
»
I own this record.


Communiblog Communiblog expressed as RSS 2.0
Here at IMX
Memes R' Us
freetheaudio2.jpg
SuperNova 1987A from 1994 to 2003
GarageBand

OmniWeb is relevant.
[ Posted by Dan on August 12, 2003 | 3 Comments ]

For a very long time, I have felt that OmniWeb is an irrelevant annoyance on the web browser landscape. I mean, who are they kidding? another browser to support, that no one uses? I'm having a hard enough time writing compliant code that renders consistently in Mozilla and Internet Explorer. Safari came along and completely marginalized a mostly marginalized browser.

That has changed. OmniWeb 4.5 now "uses the WebCore framework from Apple for greatly improved standards support." That's the engine that runs Safari, so OmniWeb is essentially, just another Safari browser, but with one crucial difference. There's a JavaScript Console now, that shows me errors that might be occurring in the page I am developing. The error messages are a bit cryptic, but are still more useful than the errors that Safari gives you (read: none). I would prefer that the error messages were a bit more like Mozilla's though.

In the environment that I work in, we have more than 15% of our users running Safari. That's a pretty high percentage, and definitely passes the "they can't be ignored" ratio (which is, imho, about 8%). Not only can't they be ignored, but functionality can't just gracefully degrade, it has to be on par with IE and Mozilla support. OmniWeb's JavaScript Console makes that easier. If I were the business/marketing wonk down at The Omni Group, I'd be pushing that behind the registration fee. But I'm not, so I'm glad it's not.

 

I'll have to grab a copy. Omniweb's a gorgeous browser with the best font rendering out there. But I use safari most of the time. There are some sites that safari still crashes on all the time, though, so Omniweb gets to be my ticket there. :-)

-Posted by JC on August 12, 2003 05:23 PM

If it us using KHTML for a rendering core then what is the point of using it unstead of Safari or Mozilla

-Posted by Jake of 8bitjoystick.com on August 12, 2003 10:38 PM

Since it has a JavaScript console, and Safari doesn't, then I have a development tool available to me on the KHTML platform. That's a great thing to have.

I don't know if KHTML on Linux has a JavaScript console, and if it did, I wouldn't use it because I don't use Linux as a desktop OS. so, OmniWeb is, In My Experience, relevent.

-Posted by Dan on August 13, 2003 09:55 AM




Comment posting has been turned off because I don't have enough time and will to deal with the constant comment spamming. I'm very sorry and will fix this sometime soon (soon = before 2004 ends).

MovableType AmphetaDesk
NetNewsWire BlogTree Subscribe with Bloglines RSS Feed
Copyright © 2001 - 2003 by Daniel Kapusta