» in my experience...
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elsewhere...
·8bit joystick ·a list apart ·amishrobot ·arcadezen ·antipixel ·boxes and arrows ·black belt jones ·curiousLee ·daring fireball ·design interact ·design not found ·everything hurts ·forwarding address: osx ·gridface ·info design ·izzywizzy ·jon madisons ·joshua kaufman ·k10k ·kalsey ·kelake ·kuro5hin ·the lion's web(log) ·louise ferguson ·memepool ·metafilter ·quinn macdonald ·railhead design ·rentzsch ·surfin' safari ·the onion ·winterspeak ·web-graphics ·xblog ·zen haiku Here at IMX
Recent posts...
·Unreal 2 is... uh, not so great. ·Video Game legitimization. ·Random access info architecture. ·Too soon. ·I want my P2P. ·Detecting alphanumeric characters in JavaScript. ·Having some copyright fun with GarageBand. ·Are five minute compositions worth anything? ·Yeah, GarageBand is cool. ·Taking the plunge (again).
Categorically speaking...
·AOL
·Apple and Mac OSX ·Books and Reading ·Business Technology ·Design ·Design Technology ·Effort ·Gaming ·Information Architecture ·Interaction Design ·Internet Consulting ·JavaScript ·O'Reilly Emerging Tech Conference ·Personal ·Photography ·Random ·Software ·U and I ·UI Programming ·Usability ·User Experience ·Web Browsers ·Weblogs and Blogging ·When Bad Things Happen to Good BMW's Memes R' Us
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OmniWeb is relevant.
[ Posted by Dan on August 12, 2003 | 3 Comments ] For a very long time, I have felt that OmniWeb is an irrelevant annoyance on the web browser landscape. I mean, who are they kidding? another browser to support, that no one uses? I'm having a hard enough time writing compliant code that renders consistently in Mozilla and Internet Explorer. Safari came along and completely marginalized a mostly marginalized browser. That has changed. OmniWeb 4.5 now "uses the WebCore framework from Apple for greatly improved standards support." That's the engine that runs Safari, so OmniWeb is essentially, just another Safari browser, but with one crucial difference. There's a JavaScript Console now, that shows me errors that might be occurring in the page I am developing. The error messages are a bit cryptic, but are still more useful than the errors that Safari gives you (read: none). I would prefer that the error messages were a bit more like Mozilla's though. In the environment that I work in, we have more than 15% of our users running Safari. That's a pretty high percentage, and definitely passes the "they can't be ignored" ratio (which is, imho, about 8%). Not only can't they be ignored, but functionality can't just gracefully degrade, it has to be on par with IE and Mozilla support. OmniWeb's JavaScript Console makes that easier. If I were the business/marketing wonk down at The Omni Group, I'd be pushing that behind the registration fee. But I'm not, so I'm glad it's not.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2001 - 2003 by Daniel Kapusta | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||